Stanwell Perpetual has never been adequately explained. Its mother was supposedly a wild spinosissima and its father is believed to be Quatre Saisons , mainly because it must have remontency somewhere in its ancestry and Quatre Saisons was the only remontant rose around. The problem is that Stanwell Perpetual is not only remontant, it is a true perpetual (at least in my garden). Since this trait is recessive it had to have the perpetual gene in both parents i.e. both the wild spinosissima and Quatre Saisons had to be carrying the gene and there is no evidence either parent has this in its DNA.
At least 9 of the once blooming pimpinellifoliae that I currently have in my garden rebloom at least once. One of my three Golden Chersonese was in bloom between June and September 2010. I believe that the pimpinellifoliae in general and the spinosissimas in particular have remontency and perhaps even perpetual blooming in their genes, I also suspect that the spinosissimas have yellow in their genes. Itâs unfortunate that these traits were not followed up and rosedom turned almost its complete attention to the China roses in the early 19th century.
Stanwell Perpetual seldom sets fertile seeds but when it does the seeds should be gathered and grown. A race of true Perpetual Spinosissimas could be the result. At least one other Perpetual Spinosissima has come from sowing SPâs seeds - Paula Vapelle, it is smaller but in my garden normally has more flowers than SP. Its color is white with yellow shadings (other sources say the shadings are green but they appear yellow to me). I do not know whether Paula Vapelleâs seed and pollen is fertile. Mine did not set seed last year.