English not being native for me there are obviously misunderstandings.
Who said that “disease resistant HT’s are wrong”???
Not me!
If I were asked that question I would say that all major teams (with numerous, educated and skilled staffs backed by scientific research programs some I personnaly met) are at it as first goal since tenths of years.
You know the actual results: the best desease resistant HT: Elina is from a marginal if a pro breeder: Dickson. The better desease resistant shrubs: Baby Love, Flower Carpet, Pretty Lady and Knock Out are from marginal breeders that were scarcely pros when introducing them.
I know there are other resistant vars and that there are progresses made or to be expected. Let me only say that, if considered are investment amounts and that most roses introduced are novelties, actual rose betterment is formidably inefficient.
As I am not a gambler I do not hope getting better results than the major players at Hts with millions of seedlings yearly nor do I wait for the unlikely lucky strike.
That is why I am all in favor of going out of beaten pathes and doing things the major are not at. Not unlike Ralph Moore does.
About: “what is good in the French Riviera may be a piece of crap in Portland, Oregon”.
It is an eventuality that cannot be presumed. Neither the reverse proposition. Nor any similar sentence.
Oppositely Meilland did and is breeding some nice roses here. Some outstanding in Oregon and worldwide. I.e.just to name one: Peace.
Do not take it personnaly: mostly I am only speculating.
We do not have to agree and have common ideas.
On the contrary I feel it is sound that we disagree. Only past is fact. Future is full of different potentialities a few of which only will materialize. We may guess at which but nobody knows.
I love friendly controverse.