I found the article that I was thinking of, and it was not written by Karl King, it was written by Ryck Birch.
The following is a summary (the article is 4 pages):
There are two sources of remontancy in our hybrid roses. One line comes from the Autumn Damasks/Damask Perpetuals [DPs]. The other from the Chinese roses. Both of these lines started being actively developed at roughly the same time [the DPs got a head start; some work was being done with them–not much–before the Chinese roses hit Europe].
The Hybrid Perpetuals [HPs], which arose out of the combination of the Chinese and European rose stocks, were remontant, that is, they rebloomed, but were not continuous bloomers in the sense that the Tea roses were or our modern Hybrid Teas [HTs], Floribundas [Fs], et al., are. In fact, they show a considerable range of ability in rebloom: from the scant flower in the fall to generally consistent and reliable cycles of bloom (like our modem roses).
It is possible that we are looking at the competition of 2 sets of genes: 1) those for blooming, and 2) those that shut off blooming. Further, let us assume that each of these capacities follows quadrivalent inheritance patterns.
In nature, a plant in the temperate world does not want to keep flowering on into winter. It blooms and then ripens its fruit. This takes time and energy–typically more than what is required to make additional vegetative growth. The plant’s general growth cycle includes the sequence of bud-sprouting, growth, flowering, and ripening of seed. Under normal circumstances, the plant undergoes a response to the signal that it’s the right time to grow and flower. The flowering genes are switched on, initiate flowers and then are switched off.
Remontancy, in general, would then be a malfunctioning in one, the other, or both of these growth regulating mechanisms. Such malfunctions would center on 1) the gene(s) for flowering not shutting down when finished with its(/their) activity in response to the shut down signal: “Spring is over, time to stop flowering”, or, 2) on the inability of that(/those) stop growing signal gene(s) to function.
I have “watered down” the scientific level of his comments considerably. In doing so, I hope that I have not lost his intended meaning.
He does discuss the rugosa behavior (which would apply to the question in this thread of whether there are two types of remontancy genes). The following is a quote:
“Generally speaking, I would expect that cold climate adapted remontancy would take the form of the lack of rebloom suppression while warm climate adapted remontancy would be based on lack of flowering genes being shut off. I am particularly thinking of R. rugosa in this regard. Fast seed ripening presumably allowed such a mutation–no rebloom suppression–to survive and multiply. I would also imagine that the Chinese roses may have been more weakly selected for rebloom suppression given their mild climate. (This would have bearing on the problematic issue of getting these roses to go dormant those of us in the North.)”