Jeff,
If you have roses, chances are that your roses will have blackspot unless you live in a climate (a desert, for instance) where your leaves never have water on them for about 6 hours at a time when the temperature is at or above 60 F (approximately).
And there are different strains of blackspot, so that a variety that is apparently resistant to blackspot in one area may be a blackspot magnet in another.
And the apparent resistance of the rose to blackspot may be increased by the presence of other, competing fungi inside the leaves. We don’t realize that the fungi are there, so we think that it’s the rose that’s resistant, but the apparent resistance of the rose is a result of fungal action.
Some people live where they’re able to get by without spraying their roses. Either their roses never have blackspot (maybe in the Mojave Desert) or they don’t get so much that it prevents the roses from blooming normally (or close to it) or that it bothers those growing the roses (whichever is the critical factor).
I don’t live in a place like that. I live in a hollow in West Virginia. A hollow has poor air circulation, and stays damp most of the time. My hollow may be the fungus capital of the universe. A rose without leaves is a poor adornment and an even poorer producer of seeds. Although I am interested in breeding roses which are disease resistant, the breeding of roses requires seed production. So I spray my roses every 10 days or so.
Actually, I fog my roses. I bought an Atomist 1026B (sort of a backwards vacuum cleaner) more than 30 years ago, and I still use it. I can fog all my roses with less than 4 gallons of spray material. The Atomist is still produced. Details upon request.
There are several ways to decrease problems with blackspot on roses, and it’s possible to use more than one.
The first way is to plant only roses that get little or no blackspot. Where I live, that means a few species roses, a few varieties of Knock Out, and some tall-growing varieties, such as Scarlet Meidiland, that have leaves far from the damp ground and from water-splashed fungi.
The second way is to provide a healthy environment: good ventilation, and good, balanced nutrition, something that your roses will have if you treat the soil well and encourage the growth of mycorrhizal fungi in the soil. Excessive nitrogen encourages the sort of growth that is more susceptible to blackspot and other diseases, and attracts insects that feed on lush growth, so don’t pile on the chemical (or organic) fertilizers/manures: too much of one thing or another throws nutrition out of balance.
The third way is to spray the leaves with things which may help the plant resist infection. Harpin proteins (available as the product Messenger from Eden Bioscience, but not registered in California or Montana) are reported to make it more difficult for germinating spores to penetrate leaf surfaces. Biofungicides such as Serenade are reported to prevent leaf infection. If you use either of these successfully, let us know about it.
The fourth way is to spray the leaves with fungicides that prevent the spores from germinating or getting established in the leaf. People have made claims for the effectiveness of a variety of products over the years: milk, Miracid, sulfur, sodium or potassium bicarbonate, and a tremendous variety of other chemicals, some with almost unpronounceable names sold under more pronounceable names. And some of these work in particular locations. Most modern fungicides are variations on the things you may use to get rid of athlete’s foot. In recent years I have used Bayer Advanced Disease Control for Roses, Flower, and Shrubs (link below). It works better than others I’ve tried, and my roses don’t have athlete’s foot. Other fungicides may work better in other places, but I don’t have experience with those.
Some claim that a garden left unsprayed for several years will develop a fungal ecology that makes blackspot a minor problem. I tried that–it didn’t work for my location.
Others claim that all sorts of sprays cause cancer or show a tendency to cause cancer. It’s possible to bring out all sorts of studies that support almost any conclusion about whether these sprays cause cancer or other diseases. My guess is that the cancer-causing effect of carefully applied modern fungicides during one rose season in one person’s garden is somewhat less than the cancer-causing effect of driving a passenger car one mile, or of riding inside a car where many of the materials around you are made of plastic and the air you inhale is filled with trace amounts of plasticizers and all sorts of other cool chemicals released as vapors from the steering wheel, radio knobs, seat and door trim, etc. Alternative means of transportation to get you to a store to buy fungicide might also have their drawbacks. For example, you might be inhaling the air a few feet behind a pair of horses or other animals. There are many trade-offs in life.
Just as you can find lots of controversy about whether you should use fungicides, you can find lots of websites where people offer absolute opinions based on little discernible evidence and no apparent thought process. The ability to put up a website or to put text into a website template is not evidence of omniscience. Don’t believe everything you read. Taking out a rose just because it gets blackspot is mostly not very smart since almost all roses get blackspot. If you want to grow roses, go ahead: grow roses.
Keep Betty Boop if you like it. It’s no more susceptible to blackspot than lots of other roses, so grow it and enjoy it and get out there and sling some pollen. It’s that time of year.
Peter
Link: www.bayeradvanced.com/product/Disease-Control-Roses-Flowers-Shrubs/concentrate.html