Larry,
I don’t disagree in principle. But I’d still like to know whether the “new” BS afflicts the old HTs such as ‘La France’, ‘Lady Mary Fitzwilliam’, ‘Mme. Caroline Testiout’. Are the old Tea roses and Noisettes now susceptible to BS?
Another example from the grains is the Southern Corn Blight. In the early 1970s ('71?), there was a panic among American farmers when the Blight abruptly spread far north of its usual range. There was a fear that the Blight had mutated to a more virulent form that put the U.S. corn crop at risk. Fortunately, this was not the case.
Some years earlier, corn breeders located a male sterile line of corn. Popular inbreds were bred into this male sterile line, producing new lines that made it easier and more profitable to raise F1 “hybrids” because it was no longer necessary to hire people to pull out the tassels of the seed parents. No one understood at the time that corn with the “Texas Cytoplasm” were especially susceptible to blight.
Coincidentally, the Summer of the Blight was unusually hot and humid over much of the Corn Belt.
Thus, again, there was both an Internal and an External “cause” of the new epidemic that had nothing to do with any hypothetical changes in the blight itself.
Viruses also offer more puzzlements.
It was learned long ago that peach scions can be grafted onto plum stocks with no limit to species or cultivars. But it was puzzling that certain peach/peach grafts generally failed. The problem turned out to be a virus. Apparently, plums in general are not affected (or infected) by the virus. Peaches, on the other hand, are susceptible to infection, but some cultivars tolerate the virus without expressing adverse symptoms. Grafting a tolerant peach carrying the virus to an intolerant type leads to disease and death of the stock. Reversing the graft (intolerant on tolerant/infected) leads to death of the scion.